Court says travel company cannot tell others how much flights to the South West cost


from let’s go department

A few months ago, we wrote about Southwest Airlines’ ridiculously adversarial legal strategy against aggregators who allegedly pull flight and price information from and help people find flights and prices. The case we covered was the one against Skiplagged, but it was related to a separate case against Skiplagged had argued that it was not violating Southwest’s terms of service since it was not harvesting Southwest’s information…but rather had extracted it from another site,, which in turn had retrieved from

Just the fact that we argue about whether or not it is legal to recover data from publicly accessible websites should alert you to the fact that these lawsuits are absurd. Factual data – such as flight routes and prices – is not protected by any intellectual property and if you publish it, people can (and should!) copy and distribute it elsewhere. But, sadly, the court ruled against last fall, granting Southwest an injunction saying Kiwi can no longer scrape its site for data. Realizing he was in trouble, it seems Kiwi gave in and settled the lawsuit agreeing to no longer collect data on Southwest flights.

In view of this, the court has now makes the preliminary injunction a permanent injunction prohibiting Kiwi and any of its employees from deleting data from Southwest’s site. The court assumes that Southwest can simply say in its terms of service that you cannot copy data from its website and that is a valid contract. That looks dangerously empowering for terms of service. May I add to Techdirt’s Terms of Use that by reading this site, you agree to place all copyrighted works you create in the public domain?

The Southwest Terms and Conditions constitute a valid and binding contract, and has accepted these Terms and Conditions when using the Southwest Website with knowledge of the Terms and Conditions; violated the terms and conditions when it, among other things, collected and extracted data from Southwest’s website, published Southwest’s flight schedules and fares on, used Southwest’s website for’s own business purposes, and brokering and selling Southwest flights without authorization;

Violations of the Terms and Conditions by have caused Southwest irreparable harm, including loss of traffic to its website, customer service charges, operational disruptions, and damage to its reputation; and

After considering the balance of harms, the threat of harm to Southwest if the injunction were denied outweighed the harm to because, among other things, unauthorized sales of Southwest flights by significantly disrupt operations of its customers and the public interests would be served if an injunction were granted because the parties to the contracts are expected to honor their contractual obligations.

Those last two paragraphs also seem completely absurd. If people find it easier to use a third-party service than your own site, well, that should mean you should work to improve your own site, not sue them. Many things lead to “loss of traffic” on a website, including better service from a competitor. But we’re not saying it violates the law.

Anyway, because of this, no one associated with can ever “pull” information from Southwest’s website or even post Southwest’s flight data on their website and honestly, I don’t I don’t see how that could be legal. Data is data. You shouldn’t be able to ban a company from publishing data.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, Inc. and sro, and their officers, agents, servants, employees and attorneys and all other persons acting in concert or in active participation with them, are permanently prohibited, restricted and permanently prohibited from: (1) harvesting, mining or extracting any information from Southwest’s website,, or its proprietary servers, including Southwest’s flight and fare information; (2) publish Southwest flight or fare information on the website, through its mobile applications or elsewhere; (3) otherwise access and use the Southwest Website and Data for business purposes; (4) sell flights to the southwest; and (5) commit any other act in violation of Southwest’s Terms and Conditions

What an unfortunate state of events – but also a very clear reminder that Southwest is anti-consumer in its practices.

Thanks for reading this Techdirt post. With so much competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate your giving us your time. We work hard every day to deliver quality content to our community.

Techdirt is one of the few media that is still truly independent. We don’t have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in a time when advertisers are less and less interested in sponsoring small independent sites – especially a site like ours that doesn’t does not want to throw punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertisements, we have always kept Techdirt open and accessible to everyone. But to continue to do so, we need your support. We offer our readers a variety of ways to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool products – and every little bit counts. Thank you.

–The Techdirt team

Filed under: data, theft, price, scraping, sharing
Companies: kiwi, southwest

Source link

Comments are closed.